<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Marcus Camby Trade/Gifting and a Preview of the New-Look Clippers Roster</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.indignantonline.com/2008/07/15/the-marcus-camby-tradegifting-and-a-preview-of-the-new-look-clippers-roster/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.indignantonline.com/2008/07/15/the-marcus-camby-tradegifting-and-a-preview-of-the-new-look-clippers-roster/</link>
	<description>Because Attitude Matters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2011 04:46:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dude</title>
		<link>http://www.indignantonline.com/2008/07/15/the-marcus-camby-tradegifting-and-a-preview-of-the-new-look-clippers-roster/comment-page-1/#comment-127</link>
		<dc:creator>dude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 04:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indignantonline.com/2008/07/15/the-marcus-camby-tradegifting-and-a-preview-of-the-new-look-clippers-roster/#comment-127</guid>
		<description>Well this was a well written piece.  You are talking about losing maggette/brand/cassel and upgrading with
baron/camby/gordon but that is way off.  First Brand was out all last season excluding 8 games, so there was never a chance for him to play with kaman which I don&#039;t think you brought up.  Second Baron is a HUGE upgrade vs. cassel so that doesn&#039;t even make sense.  Thornton plays sf where maggs was so that is probably almost a no lose position.  Brand is better than camby but camby brings more defense and with kaman/baron/thorn  scoring I think we get enough of the O we need.  Plus camby can hit the open mid-range so that will keep kaman single coverage.  Agreed we need more but not much more, elite bench sf and c/pf and we are good to go.  If everyone stays healthy I am calling we are making a run at #4 spot with all the pieces added I mentioned.  We would have the best post D in the league immediately.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well this was a well written piece.  You are talking about losing maggette/brand/cassel and upgrading with<br />
baron/camby/gordon but that is way off.  First Brand was out all last season excluding 8 games, so there was never a chance for him to play with kaman which I don&#8217;t think you brought up.  Second Baron is a HUGE upgrade vs. cassel so that doesn&#8217;t even make sense.  Thornton plays sf where maggs was so that is probably almost a no lose position.  Brand is better than camby but camby brings more defense and with kaman/baron/thorn  scoring I think we get enough of the O we need.  Plus camby can hit the open mid-range so that will keep kaman single coverage.  Agreed we need more but not much more, elite bench sf and c/pf and we are good to go.  If everyone stays healthy I am calling we are making a run at #4 spot with all the pieces added I mentioned.  We would have the best post D in the league immediately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

