<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wednesday Comics &#8211; Good Content, But Cheap Newsprint</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.indignantonline.com/2009/07/08/wednesday-comics-good-content-but-cheap-newsprint/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.indignantonline.com/2009/07/08/wednesday-comics-good-content-but-cheap-newsprint/</link>
	<description>Because Attitude Matters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2011 04:46:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Atomic Kommie Comics</title>
		<link>http://www.indignantonline.com/2009/07/08/wednesday-comics-good-content-but-cheap-newsprint/comment-page-1/#comment-678</link>
		<dc:creator>Atomic Kommie Comics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 16:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indignantonline.com/?p=232#comment-678</guid>
		<description>The art was obviously not done with newsprint in mind.
When I saw the full-page preview in USA Today, I grimaced.
The actual product made me groan.
If they tone down the phtoshop fx, or even go retro with a 85 or 100 line screen, it&#039;d look a lot better (and closer to it&#039;s model, the 1940s-60s comics pages)!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The art was obviously not done with newsprint in mind.<br />
When I saw the full-page preview in USA Today, I grimaced.<br />
The actual product made me groan.<br />
If they tone down the phtoshop fx, or even go retro with a 85 or 100 line screen, it&#8217;d look a lot better (and closer to it&#8217;s model, the 1940s-60s comics pages)!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uthor</title>
		<link>http://www.indignantonline.com/2009/07/08/wednesday-comics-good-content-but-cheap-newsprint/comment-page-1/#comment-666</link>
		<dc:creator>Uthor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 10:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indignantonline.com/?p=232#comment-666</guid>
		<description>Who cares about the paper (other than it being really pleasant to read while holding essentially a newspaper)?  The content is great and it a) took longer to read and b) was more interesting than most other $4 books I&#039;ve bought in the last year.

If I&#039;m given a choice between &quot;cheap&quot; newsprint with great stories and super nice high gloss paper with average stories, I know where my money is going.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who cares about the paper (other than it being really pleasant to read while holding essentially a newspaper)?  The content is great and it a) took longer to read and b) was more interesting than most other $4 books I&#8217;ve bought in the last year.</p>
<p>If I&#8217;m given a choice between &#8220;cheap&#8221; newsprint with great stories and super nice high gloss paper with average stories, I know where my money is going.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

